Psychological, Psychosocial and Obstetric Differences between Spanish and Immigrant Mothers: Retrospective Observational Study.

This study analyzed the influence of psychological and psychosocial factors of pregnant women at an obstetric level. The possible differences between Spaniards and immigrants were studied. This was a retrospective observational study. The sample has been divided into two study cohorts, one consisting of Spanish pregnant women and one consisting of foreign pregnant women. Both completed the Revised Postpartum Depression Predictors Inventory and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. A total of 15.9% of Spanish women and 23.2% of immigrants had depressive symptoms. Immigrants claim to have less support at the partner, family, and friendship levels than Spaniards. Moreover, 16.4% of Spaniards vs. 8.1% of immigrants had pregnancy complications; Cesarean section was performed in 16.2% of Spaniards vs. 7.9% of immigrants. A greater number of premature births were detected in immigrants than in Spaniards. Access to universal healthcare is a protective factor against socioeconomic and cultural conditions affecting the mental and obstetrical health of immigrants.

Healthy Moms and Babies Preventive Psychological Intervention Application: A Study Protocol.

Depression is the most common psychological disorder during the perinatal period, and its negative effects extend to mothers, babies, their family and society. Scientific evidence points to the urgency of designing preventive interventions and concludes that the gestational period is the most appropriate time to implement these interventions. However, many pregnant women do not seek professional help due to a lack of knowledge about the importance of mental health, its impact, and the available intervention options, as well as a lack of time and financial resources. E-health interventions can be an efficient, cost-effective, and accessible resource for preventing postpartum depression that can circumvent the barriers that pregnant women face. This randomized clinical trial will examine the efficacy of Healthy Moms and Babies, an app aimed at preventing postpartum depressive symptomatology. The second objective of this study is to analyze the effectiveness of the tool in preventing anxious symptomatology. The primary outcome measure is the difference in the mean score between the intervention and control groups on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) at the end of the intervention and at 3 and 6 months postpartum. The secondary outcome will be determined by using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7) at the same time points. The research findings can be used to determine pregnant women's use of the e-health application for the prevention of postpartum depression, whether the Healthy Moms and Babies intervention app is an effective and useful resource, and what modifications will need to be made to the tool in future updates.

Impact of nosocomial infections on patient mortality following cardiac surgery.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate of nosocomial infection among patients undergoing cardiac surgery and to identify risk factors and the impact of these infections on patient mortality. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Intensive Care Unit (ICU). PATIENTS: 1097 adult patients who underwent cardiac surgery at Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid between January 2011 and January 2016. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS: Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative medical, surgical and anaesthetic variables. MAIN RESULTS: A total of 111 patients (10.1%) acquired a nosocomial infection in the postoperative period. Pneumonia was the most frequent (4.2%) nosocomial infection. Three independent risk factors for the development of a nosocomial infection were identified: cardiopulmonary bypass time, kidney failure and emergency surgery. The stay in the ICU was significantly higher in patients who developed a nosocomial infection (16.6 ±â€¯38.8 vs. 4.4 ±â€¯17.8, P < 0.001). The mortality rate of patients who acquired a nosocomial infection was significantly greater (18%) than that of patients who did not acquire a nosocomial infection (5%) (P < 0.001). The 90-day survival was greater in the group of patients without nosocomial infection (log rank 27.55, P < 0.001). The dynamic modelling of 90-day mortality revealed that in the first week, cardiopulmonary bypass time (HR = 1.00, 95% CI 1.00-1.02, P < 0.001) and emergency surgery (HR = 0.12, 95% CI 0.04-0.37, P < 0.001) were the most important risk factors for mortality, while after the first week, nosocomial infection (HR = 6.23, 95% CI 2.49-15.63, P < 0.001) was the main risk factor, followed by cardiopulmonary bypass time (HR = 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.01, P = 0.001) and EuroSCORE (HR = 1.03, 95% CI 1.00-1.06, P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Nosocomial infections after cardiac surgery constitute the main independent risk factor for mortality after the first week of surgery. These data suggest that its prevention following cardiac surgery must be prioritised to improve patient outcomes.

A Cross-Cultural Analysis of the Prevalence and Risk Factors for Prenatal Depression in Spain and Mexico.

The prevalence and risk factors associated with prenatal depression among Spanish-speaking women in Spain and Mexico are examined and compared through a cross-cultural study. The study utilizes secondary data from 563 participants who received prenatal care in Madrid (N = 283) and in Mexico City (N = 280), assessed with the PHQ-9 and the PDPI-R. Spanish women reported a lower prevalence of depressive symptoms (10.0%) than Mexican women (20.3%). Regression analyses showed that previous prenatal anxiety and lack of family emotional support were common risk factors to the two countries. Within each country, significant risk factors included: (a) previous depression history (ß = 0.224; p < 0.001) in Spain; and (b) unplanned pregnancy (ß = - 0.116; p < 0.027), lack of emotional support from others (ß = 0.129; p < 0.032), marital dissatisfaction (ß = 0.186; p < 0.009), and life stress due to financial problems (ß = 0.117; p < 0.026), and life stress due to marital problems (ß = 0.114; p < 0.040) in Mexico. Health professionals can tailor interventions to their particular risk factors to reduce the adverse effects on mothers and infants.

A pathway to excellence

No disponible

Etiología y prevalencia de los cánceres colorrectales poscolonoscopia / Aetiology and prevalence of post-colonoscopy colorrectal cancer

INTRODUCCIÓN: La colonoscopia es el gold standard en la detección y prevención del cáncer colorrectal (CCR). No obstante, en la práctica clínica habitual nos encontramos con pacientes que desarrollan un CCR a pesar de que se habían sometido a una colonoscopia previamente. OBJETIVOS: Estudiar la prevalencia de CCR de novo o no detectados tras la realización de una colonoscopia y valorar los posibles factores de riesgo. PACIENTES: Se incluyen los pacientes diagnosticados de CCR registrados en la base de datos endoscópicos de nuestro hospital entre marzo de 2004 y septiembre de 2011. Identificamos los pacientes que tenían realizada una colonoscopia en los 5 años previos. Se recogieron: edad, sexo, comorbilidades e indicación de la colonoscopia, tamaño y localización del tumor, así como su grado de diferenciación, su clasificación TNM y las posibles causas. Posteriormente comparamos este subgrupo de pacientes con los que habían sido diagnosticados de CCR en su primera colonoscopia (CCR esporádico, grupo control). RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 712 pacientes diagnosticados de CCR. Veinticuatro de ellos (3,6%) tenían una colonoscopia realizada en los 5 años previos (50% varones, 50% mujeres, edad media 72años). Estos CCR poscolonoscopia se atribuyeron: uno (4,2%) a colonoscopia incompleta, 4 (16,6%) a resección incompleta de adenoma, uno (4,2%) a biopsia fallida, 8 (33,3%) a «lesiones no detectadas» y 10 (41,7%) fueron CCR de nueva aparición. Los CCR poscolonoscopia eran de menor tamaño que los CCR esporádicos (3,2 vs 4,5cm, p < 0,001), principalmente localizados en colon proximal (62% vs 35%, p = 0,006); no hubo diferencias en cuanto al grado histológico (p = 0,125), pero sí una tendencia a presentar un mejor estadio TNM (p = 0,053). CONCLUSIONES: La tasa de CCR tras una colonoscopia previa en nuestra serie es del 3,6%. Las posibles causas de estos CCR se atribuyeron en su mayoría (58,4%) a factores relacionados al procedimiento endoscópico y, por tanto, evitables. Estos hallazgos reafirman la importancia de ajustarse a los indicadores de calidad de la colonoscopia. Los CCR poscolonoscopia fueron de menor tamaño, localizados fundamentalmente en colon derecho y con tendencia a presentar un estadio TNM más precoz

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy is the gold standard for the detection and prevention of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, some individuals are diagnosed with CRC soon after a previous colonoscopy. AIMS: To evaluate the rate of new onset or missed CRC after a previous colonoscopy and to study potential risk factors. METHODS: Patients in our endoscopy database diagnosed with CRC from March 2004 to September 2011 were identified, selecting those with a colonoscopy performed within the previous 5years. Medical records included age, gender, comorbidities and colonoscopy indication. Tumour characteristics studied were localization, size, histological grade and TNM stage and possible cause. These patients were compared with those diagnosed with CRC at their first endoscopy (sporadic CRC-control group). RESULTS: A total of 712 patients with CRC were included; 24 patients (3.6%) had undergone colonoscopy within the previous 5 years (50% male, 50% female, mean age 72). Post-colonoscopy CRCs were attributed to: 1 (4.2%) incomplete colonoscopy, 4 (16.6%) incomplete polyp removal, 1 (4.2%) failed biopsy, 8 (33.3%) 'missed lesions' and 10 (41.7%) new onset CRC. Post-colonoscopy CRCs were smaller in size than sporadic CRCs (3.2cm vs. 4.5cm, P<.001) and were mainly located in the proximal colon (63% vs. 35%, P=.006); no difference in histological grade was found (P=.125), although there was a tendency towards a lower TNM stage (P=.053). CONCLUSIONS: There is a minor risk of CRC development after a previous colonoscopy (3.6%). Most of these (58.4%) are due to preventable factors. Post-colonoscopy CRCs were smaller and mainly right-sided, with a tendency towards an earlier TNM stage

Aetiology and prevalence of post-colonoscopy colorrectal cancer. / Etiología y prevalencia de los cánceres colorrectales poscolonoscopia.

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy is the gold standard for the detection and prevention of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, some individuals are diagnosed with CRC soon after a previous colonoscopy. AIMS: To evaluate the rate of new onset or missed CRC after a previous colonoscopy and to study potential risk factors. METHODS: Patients in our endoscopy database diagnosed with CRC from March 2004 to September 2011 were identified, selecting those with a colonoscopy performed within the previous 5years. Medical records included age, gender, comorbidities and colonoscopy indication. Tumour characteristics studied were localization, size, histological grade and TNM stage and possible cause. These patients were compared with those diagnosed with CRC at their first endoscopy (sporadic CRC-control group). RESULTS: A total of 712 patients with CRC were included; 24 patients (3.6%) had undergone colonoscopy within the previous 5 years (50% male, 50% female, mean age 72). Post-colonoscopy CRCs were attributed to: 1 (4.2%) incomplete colonoscopy, 4 (16.6%) incomplete polyp removal, 1 (4.2%) failed biopsy, 8 (33.3%) 'missed lesions' and 10 (41.7%) new onset CRC. Post-colonoscopy CRCs were smaller in size than sporadic CRCs (3.2cm vs. 4.5cm, P<.001) and were mainly located in the proximal colon (63% vs. 35%, P=.006); no difference in histological grade was found (P=.125), although there was a tendency towards a lower TNM stage (P=.053). CONCLUSIONS: There is a minor risk of CRC development after a previous colonoscopy (3.6%). Most of these (58.4%) are due to preventable factors. Post-colonoscopy CRCs were smaller and mainly right-sided, with a tendency towards an earlier TNM stage.

Episcleral brachytherapy for uveal melanoma: analysis of 136 cases.

PURPOSE: To assess the results of I-125 episcleral brachytherapy (EB) in uveal melanoma: tumour control, visual acuity (VA), eye preservation and survival. PATIENTS: Prospective and consecutive study of patients with a diagnosis of uveal melanoma at the Ocular Oncology Unit in the Valladolid University Teaching Hospital treated with EB between September 1997 and June 2008. Ocular examination and extraocular and systemic extension data were registered in a database at the time of the diagnosis and during the follow-up. RESULTS: Among a total of 310 patients diagnosed between September 1997 and June 2008, 136 were treated with EB (mean age, 58.3). Mean follow-up was 55.3 months. As for tumour type, 66.9% were nodular and 39% mushroom shaped. With respect to size, 80.9% were medium, 7.4% small and 11.8% large. After 4.6 years of follow-up, tumours were controlled in 97.1%, with a 55.1% reduction in mean height; only 2.9% of patients showed recurrence. VA was maintained in 16.2% of patients and 17.6% showed an increase; 33% had retinopathy and 14.6% optic neuropathy. Only 5.1% of patients underwent enucleation due to complications and there has been 1 melanoma-related death to date. CONCLUSIONS: I-125 EB is effective in tumour control, allowing preservation of the eye and useful visual function for the majority of patients.

Influence of brucellosis history on serological diagnosis and evolution of patients with acute brucellosis.

Serological diagnosis of human brucellosis is problematic in endemic brucellosis regions and with patients having a history of brucellosis. The aim of this study is to ascertain the serologic and evolutionary behavior of the tests of serum agglutination, Coombs anti-Brucella, immunocapture-agglutination, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) IgG, IgA, IgM and ELISA-IgG avidity against Brucella lipopolysaccharide (S-LPS), in patients with acute brucellosis based on whether or not a history of brucellosis exists. Titers and seropositivity in all the tests assayed were higher in the patients having brucellosis history (from 90.9% in ELISA-IgM to 100% in ELISA-IgG) than in the patients lacking such history (from 79.3% in ELISA-IgM to 86.2% in Coombs, immunocapture-agglutination, and ELISA-IgG). IgG S-LPS avidity results in patients with brucellosis history were significantly higher (always over 84%) than in patients without brucellosis history (from 48.0% in the initial sera to 81% ten months later) (p<0.001). The titers of antibodies against Brucella in the initial sera and ELISA-IgG avidity against S-LPS may allow distinguishing patients with brucellosis caused by primary infection in the initial stages of the disease from patients seropositive due to prior infections from Brucella.